“if i’m a person of color, i’m allowed to hate white people!!!!’
“if i’m gay, i’m allowed to hate straight people!!!!”
“if i’m a woman, i’m allowed to hate men!!!”
“if i’m trans*, i’m allowed to hate cis people!!!”
if u give hate 2 the haters u give them 2 much of urself *flips hair and does a made wheelie on a motorcycle before riding off into the sunset*
Readington Middle School principal Sharon Moffat wrote a letter to parents this month laying out a dress code — “collared shirts and trousers” for boys, and a skirt or dress with straps for girls.
When parent, Charlotte Nijenhuis, disagreed with the dress code and spoke with Moffat about it, she says the principal told her strapless dresses “distract boys.” Nijenhuis says it’s neither a woman’s nor a girl’s responsibility to control a man’s or boy’s behavior.
Across the country, young girls are being told what not to wear because it might be a “distraction” for boys, or because adults decide it makes them look “inappropriate.” At its core, every incident has a common thread: Putting the onus on young women to prevent from being ogled or objectified, instead of teaching those responsible to learn to respect a woman’s body.
Rape culture is also evident in the attitudes that lead school administrators to treat young girls’ bodies as inherently “distracting” to the boys who simply can’t control themselves. That approach to gender roles simply encourages our youth to assume that sexual crimes must have something to do with women’s “suggestive” clothes or behavior, rather than teaching them that every individual is responsible for respecting others’ bodily autonomy.
1. A middle school in California banned tight pants. At the beginning of last month, a middle school in Northern California began telling girls to avoid wearing pants that are “too tight” because it “distracts the boys.” At a mandatory assembly for just the female students, the middle school girls were told that they’re no longer allowed to wear leggings or yoga pants. “We didn’t think it was fair how we have all these restrictions on our clothing while boys didn’t have to sit through [the assembly] at all,” one student told local press. Some parents also complained, leading the school’s assistant principal to record a voicemail explaining the new policy. “The guiding principle in all dress codes is that the manner in which students dress does not become a distraction in the learning environment,” the message said.
http://jezebel.com/middle-school-bans-tight-pants-because-they-distract-t-471403344
“It is not our girls’ fault that these boys have quote ‘raging hormones’ they can’t control,” said parent Lisa Simond. Another mom, Jerelyn Kruljac, wore skinny jeans last Friday in solidarity with her daughter and her friends. “Boys need to be taught to respect women no matter what they’re wearing, and that’s a big deal,” she said. via Jezebel2. A high school principal in Minnesota emailed parents to ask them to cover up their daughters. A principal in Minnetonka, MN recently wrote an email telling parents to stop letting their daughters wear leggings or yoga pants to school. He says the tight-fitting pants are fine with longer shirts but, when worn with a shorter top, a girl’s “backside” can be “too closely defined.” The big risk of having a defined backside, he thinks, is that it can “be highly distracting for other students.”
http://www.startribune.com/local/west/179141451.html?refer=y3. Two girls in Ohio were turned away from their prom for being “improperly dressed.” Laneisha Williams and Nyasia Mitchell were barred from prom this spring for wearing dresses that administrators considered “too revealing.” One administrator told local news that the high school girls were only allowed to wear dresses that had “no curvature of their breasts showing.”
http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/state/wews-girls-not-allowed-of-mt-healthy-prom-for-being-improperly-dressed13673758817564. A kindergarten student in Georgia was forced to change her “short” skirt because it was a “distraction to other students.” It’s hard to imagine that a kindergartener’s outfit could be “a distraction to other students,” but a mother in Georgia told locals news there that her daughter had been outfitted in someone else’s pants — without parental permission — after the principal deemed the skirt the young girl was wearing too short.” The girl had apparently wore the skirt, and accompanying leggings, just one week before without incident.
http://www.actionnewsjax.com/mostpopular/story/Video-Girls-short-skirt-sparks-controversy/K0HXFLmQjU-R3oWFP2B8ng.cspx5. Forty high school girls were sent home from a winter dance in California after “degrading” clothing inspections “bordering on sexual harassment.” A school board member’s daughter was among the 40 girls turned away from Capistrano Valley High’s February dance for wearing dresses that either exposed their midriffs or were cut too low. Before the dance, girls were apparently required to flap their arms up and down and turn around for male administrators’ inspection. The school issues image guidelines for appropriate dress on its website — though the images were nearly all of women, and the only male image depicted proper attire.
http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/schools/p/dance-dress-was-code-unclear-says-capo-high-principal#photo-13898367
I’D BE LOOKING MORE CLOSELY INTO THE SICK FREAKS WHO THINK A KINDERGARTENER IS TRYING TO DRESS IN A SEXUALLY PROVOCATIVE MANNER
(via clownyface)
Woman Time Lords can control the way they will look when they regenerate, while male Time Lords cannot. This was established in Classic Who, when Romana regenerated.
Also, the Doctor wanting to be Ginger is not about the hair color. In Gallifrey, the only ones to have red hair were the people called Heroes which were beings who were time-sentient (meaning they could see all of the time at the same time). So I doubt they will ever make him ginger.
(via erinmusik)
i really like matt smith’s doctor but i really don’t like moffat’s doctor who do u see what i mean
It’s the fandom equivalent of supporting the troops and being against the war.
(via erinmusik)
When Strangers Click, a 2011 documentary about online dating.
It reminds me of that famous Margaret Atwood quote: “Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.” It also reminds me of something written by one of the mods of Sex Worker Problems: “Misandry irritates. Misogyny kills.”
I mean, it’s just true.
(via tealeafprincess)
(via clownyface)